Risk Choices and Compensation Design
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Risk Choices and Compensation Design
We analyze the impact of bad-tail risks on managerial pay functions, especially the decision to pay managers in stock or in options. In contrast to conventional wisdom, we find that options are often a superior vehicle for limiting managerial incentives to take bad-tail risks while providing incentives to exert effort. Arrangements similar to collar options are able to incent the desired projec...
متن کاملStocks or Options: Risk Choices and Compensation Design
We analyze the impact of the existence of bad-tail risks on the decision to pay managers in stocks or in options and find that, contrary to conventional wisdom that options incent higher risk-taking, options are sometimes the superior vehicle for limiting managerial incentives to take bad-tail risks. Though options have not been the dominant form of compensation in the financial services indust...
متن کاملInformation Processing Design Choices, Strategy, and Risk Management Performance
We examined the relationship between information technology (IT) and organizational performance in the U.S. life/health insurance industry by applying and testing Galbraith's information processing theory and strategic contingency theory. Rather than focusing on resource allocations in IT, we instead examined the manner in which IT is deployed in organizations through information processing des...
متن کاملDependent Choices in Employee Selection: Modeling Choice Compensation and Consistency
Past choices can influence subsequent choices in employee selection. Previous approaches rather described similar sequential effects with feedback learning or the misperception of randomness. However, in the selection of job candidates also the accumulation of the moral impact of previous choices might influence subsequent choices. We investigated that question by making two major contributions...
متن کاملRisk Compensation: Revisited and Rebutted
This Commentary addresses the ongoing disagreements between many safety advocates who endorse traditional models of prevention and those who oppose them, arguing that safety measures are offset by risk compensation (RCT). The debate is especially heated with respect to regulatory or legislative prevention measures. After explaining the rationale behind risk compensation (aka risk homeostasis th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2598238